RESUMO
Objetivos: Valorar el número de lesiones incidentales detectadas por resonancia magnética (RM) cardíaca, establecer el porcentaje de hallazgos incluidos en el informe y definir el porcentaje de lesiones extracardíacas con implicancia en el manejo del paciente. Materiales y métodos: Se revisaron retrospectivamente 918 RM de corazón, realizadas desde mayo de 2006 hasta marzo de 2015, en busca de hallazgos extracardíacos. Estos fueron clasificados en nada/poco relevantes o relevantes, y en relación causa-efecto con la sintomatología cardíaca. Resultados: Se encontraron 271 hallazgos extracardíacos. El 35,7% resultó relevante y el 18,8% tenía una relación de causa-efecto con la sintomatología cardíaca. Los hallazgos extracardíacos relevantes fueron informados en el 58,4% de los casos y los poco/nada relevantes en el 26,6%. Discusión: Diferentes muestras poblacionales y protocolos de RM cardíaca pueden condicionar los porcentajes de los hallazgos extracardíacos detectados. Además, el análisis de estas imágenes tiene peculiaridades que requieren conocimiento y entrenamiento para una correcta valoración. Conclusión: Se detectaron hallazgos extracardíacos de diversa relevancia en un 26,4% de los pacientes. Analizar estos hallazgos y establecer su valoración es parte fundamental del informe radiológico de la RM cardíaca.
Objectives: To assess the number of incidental lesions detected on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in order to establish the percentage of findings included in the report and evaluate the percentage of extracardiac lesions that have implications on patient management. Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 918 cardiac MRI (performed from May 2006 to March 2015) to search for extracardiac findings. These were classified in not relevant or relevant, and in relation with cause-effect cardiac symptoms. Results: A total of 271 extracardiac findings were observed, of which 35.7% were relevant, and 18.8% had a cause-effect relationship with the cardiac symptoms. Relevant extracardiac findings were reported in 58.4% of cases, and not relevant findings in 26.6% of cases. Discussion: Different sample populations and protocols (performing cardiac MRI) can determine differences when establishing percentage of extracardiac findings. Furthermore, analysis of cardiac MR images has peculiarities that require knowledge and training for proper assessment. Conclusión: Extracardiac findings of distinct relevance were detected in 26.4% of patients. To analyse and to assess the importance of these findings is a fundamental part of the cardiac MRI report.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cardiopatias , Traumatismos Cardíacos , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética , Diagnóstico por Imagem , CoraçãoRESUMO
La filariasis es una enfermedad parasitaria causada por nemátodos, de curso benigno, endémica en algunas regiones tropicales, aunque las corrientes migratorias hacen que cada vez se vean más pacientes en nuestros centros. La muerte de los parásitos puede originar calcificaciones visibles en las mamografías con características específicas que no hay que confundir con otras enfermedades. Sin embargo, su aspecto no se recoge en los sistemas de clasificación de calcificaciones mamográficas más habituales (BI-RADS), lo que puede generar confusión. En este artículo planteamos la necesidad de actualizar estos sistemas de descripción, así como advertir del aspecto de estas calcificaciones para poder diagnosticarlas y no confundirlas con otras enfermedades (AU)
Filariasis is a parasitic disease with a benign course caused by nematodes. Filariasis is endemic in some tropical regions, and immigration has made it increasingly common in some centers in Spain. The death of the parasites can lead to calcifications that are visible in mammograms; these calcifications have specific characteristics and should not be confused with those arising in other diseases. However, the appearance of calcifications due to filariasis is not included in the most common systems used for the classification of calcifications on mammograms (BI-RADS), and this can lead to confusion. In this article, we discuss the need to update classification systems and warn radiologists about the appearance of these calcifications to ensure their correct diagnosis and avoid confusion with other diseases (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Filariose/complicações , Larva Migrans/diagnóstico , Calcinose/fisiopatologia , Mamografia/métodos , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Calcinose/classificação , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Terminologia como AssuntoRESUMO
Filariasis is a parasitic disease with a benign course caused by nematodes. Filariasis is endemic in some tropical regions, and immigration has made it increasingly common in some centers in Spain. The death of the parasites can lead to calcifications that are visible in mammograms; these calcifications have specific characteristics and should not be confused with those arising in other diseases. However, the appearance of calcifications due to filariasis is not included in the most common systems used for the classification of calcifications on mammograms (BI-RADS), and this can lead to confusion. In this article, we discuss the need to update classification systems and warn radiologists about the appearance of these calcifications to ensure their correct diagnosis and avoid confusion with other diseases.
